Tuesday, May 14, 2024

Famous Atheist Identifies as ‘Cultural Christian’

Recently, famous atheist Richard Dawkins surprised a lot of people when he said to a journalist, “I call myself a cultural Christian. I’m not a believer, but there’s a distinction between being a believing Christian and being a cultural Christian.”

Dawkins went on to explain, “I love hymns and Christmas carols, and I sort of feel at home in the Christian ethos.…We [in the U.K.] are a ‘Christian country’ in that sense.”  
Those are amazing statements, coming from the author of best-selling books such as “The God Delusion,” in which Dawkins insists anyone who believes in God is deluded; and “The Blind Watchmaker,” a tome claiming that incredibly complex biological life came into existence on this planet purely by accident, without any design or plan or supernatural guidance.

Dawkins is not wrong to recognize that Christianity is responsible for the freedoms, science, and belief in human rights that emerged from Western Civilization. Oh sure, the process was gruesome at times, with many powerful Christians displaying a startling aptitude for selfishness, greed, and hypocrisy. But the fact is, many of the great social advances of humankind — abolition of slavery, democracy, women’s suffrage, and the Civil Rights movement — were spearheaded by believing Christians.

Those advances in the rights and dignity of all people simply did not emerge in other cultures that were unfamiliar with the Judeo-Christian worldview.

It’s almost comical that Dawkins can say with a straight face that he’s glad the churches and cathedrals in England are mostly empty nowadays, while at the same time lamenting that these historic achievements in architecture are being torn down.

The thing is, Dawkins cannot have it both ways. If Christian doctrines are false — delusions, as he puts it — then Christian culture will not survive. This worries Dawkins, who expressed alarm that churches are closing all over the U.K, while 6,000 additional mosques are scheduled to be built in the coming years.

Writer Shane Morris summarized the situation quite well: “You can’t have Christianity’s fruit without its root.”

Another author, Tom Holland (who is not a Christian, by the way), had this to say: “Secularism and Dawkins’ own brand of evangelical atheism are both expressions of a specifically Christian culture — as Dawkins himself, sitting on the branch he’s been sawing through and gazing nervously at the ground far below, seems to have begun to realize.” 
I remember when I stopped being an atheist, almost four decades ago. Back in the mid-1980s, I heard a preacher on the radio say that America had become a “post-Christian nation.” The country was founded and built predominantly by believing Christians, he explained. However, by the late 20th century most people no longer believed the fundamental teachings of Christianity: the Ten Commandments, sacrificing for others, being humble and honest, etc. We were, as he put it, “a country running on Christian fumes, but it can’t last much longer.” 

Well, the changes that have occurred in our society in the past four decades make it pretty clear, to me at least, that the Christian fumes are just about used up. Our new national creed, “Do whatever you want!” is not really working out so well. When a culture rejects traditional morality as old-fashioned, it does not become amoral, it becomes immoral.

Another talented writer, Rod Dreher, observed that for Richard Dawkins to claim that he likes cathedrals and Christmas carols, but is glad church attendance is declining, is like saying he enjoys eating but is glad his country’s farms are closing. 

It’s tempting to read about Dawkins’ interview and laugh at how this otherwise brilliant man cannot see the forest because of the trees. The first impulse is to mock a person who has been such a relentless opponent of religious faith for so many years. (And I, unfortunately, was born with an abundant supply of mockiness.)
But I think the proper thing to do here is pray for Richard Dawkins. Just think how powerful a witness he could be if, as happened with philosopher Antony Flew in 2004, Dawkins comes to understand in the final years of his life that creation requires a Creator. 

We should do what Christians are always supposed to do: love God, and love our neighbor as ourselves.

6 comments:

  1. “The Blind Watchmaker,” a tome claiming that incredibly complex biological life came into existence on this planet purely by accident, without any design or plan or supernatural guidance." Life is not a random accident as Professor Dawkins explains and as I have said many times here before......there is nothing accidentally random about it. ....It is not designed or created but it IS a biological feedback loop....natural selection is the process that runs evolution...again it is not at all random......what works and fits in the environment is selected over and over again while what does not work dies out. This not only explains but causes the complexity of life...No creator or plan is needed. Indeed the discovery of natural selection showed that to be the case.
    Ruth O'Keefe

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it is also worth noting that you have managed to mock Mr. Dawkins in a passive aggressive manner. You say he is mock worthy and you are a born mocker---so you have mocked him without having the maturity to take responsibility for doing so. Then you switch gears and say let's be christian and pray for him, pretending that you are respectful of him and other atheists.
    Mr. Dawkins on the other hand has the maturity to tell the truth, state plainly that he is an atheist and a cultural christian, and accept the ambiguity of this statement and
    life in general for that matter-----and he is a gracious gentleman who never mocks anyone or disrespects their opinion or belief....He strongly discourages belief and challenges it......he does not mock or disrespect.....If he did he would take responsibility for it
    Ruth O'Keefe

    ReplyDelete
  3. In fact all this article really is, is, yet again, another attack on atheists......Why not just go straight to let's pray for Mr Dawkins without the mocking paragraph and the picture of him sawing himself out of a tree? Why not state what he said, your disagreement of it and the other comments you made.........and then go to let's pray for him? Would that not have been the christian way...No, the intent here is to present Mr. Dawkins as a big dumb jerk. You're real attitude towards atheist is one of intense disrespect, and yes, mocking...
    Ruth O'Keefe

    ReplyDelete
  4. And since you believe that atheists will end up screaming in agony for all eternity in never extinguishing, never consuming fire.....why is that not enough for you......Simply wait and all the atheists you hate so will soon be in agony and you will have your vengeance. Is that not enough for you? Have you not the slightest pity for them?

    Ruth O'Keefe

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr. Dawkins, by the way, is an exceptional person. He has a lovely, pleasant personality and has a great sense of fun as well. He has been gifted with a high intelligence which he has used productively to educate his fellow humans in his field of biology.....He is very polite and respectful.....he is attractive and dresses well and presents himself well......He is hated and vilified simply because he is an atheist and insists that religion is not exempt from being questioned any more than any other subject.......Hated and vilified by the so called followers of Christ......the peacemaker.........Mr. Dunn loves to hit on, and be nasty to atheists........he hates them and enjoys it.

    Ruth O'Keefe

    ReplyDelete
  6. Again quoted from John Paul 2 ----"Everybody that is just is called to form part of the kingdom of heaven whether they be buddhas, Jews, or atheists....as long as they are good"

    Ruth O'Keefe

    ReplyDelete