I am grateful my parish choir welcomes
mediocre voices, and has enough good voices for me to hide behind. This allows
me to be a very small part of a very big sound, especially next week when we sing
the Lord’s praises on Holy Thursday, Good Friday, Easter Vigil, and Easter
morning. Now, if I can keep from getting laryngitis this year…..
Thoughts and observations of a Recovering Atheist, Baby Boomer, Left-Handed Red Sox fan. Contact at MerryCatholic@gmail.com
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
Time To Emphasize Sunday Obligation
A couple months ago we had unexpected
freezing rain on Sunday morning. On the way to Mass I saw a car that had slid
off the side of the road. When I arrived at church I pressed the brake pedal
and my car just kept going, gliding down the icy road right past the entrance
to the parking lot.
The roads were very treacherous, and
not surprisingly Mass attendance was a fraction of what it usually is. As I
looked around the mostly empty church, I started thinking about the phrase
“Sunday Obligation.” I haven’t heard that term mentioned in quite a while. Our
Church has a very clear teaching on the issue of Sunday Obligation, which not
surprisingly, goes something like this: on Sundays Catholics are obligated to
go to Mass. See, that isn’t so complicated, is it? The Catechism of the
Catholic Church says it’s a “grave sin” not to attend Mass on Sunday (or
Saturday vigil Mass).
Now, of course, there are valid
excuses for not attending Sunday Mass, such as illness, infirmity, family needs
that can’t be helped (such as caring for a sick child), and employment
responsibilities—but only when all other options have been exhausted. And
obviously treacherous weather conditions are a valid excuse, too.
When I was a kid the nuns taught us
that the word obligation comes from two Latin words, obli, which means “you had better,” and gation, which means “get to Mass or I’ll whack you with this ruler!”
OK, maybe they didn’t exactly phrase it that way, but we got the message.
However, nowadays modern Catholics use
a more sophisticated definition, deciding that the word obligation really means:
“If I feel like it.” A lot of folks don’t even need the illness, employment, or
icy road excuses. They simply declare, “I’m not going to Mass cuz I don’t feel like
it.” And that’s that.
As I sat in the mostly empty church
that icy morning, I wondered if Masses on sunny days in the near future would
be as sparsely attended, since the trend continues to go in the wrong
direction.
Why is Mass attendance plummeting, at
least here in America? (Western Europe is even worse, by the way.) In recent
decades I can’t remember any Church official boldly proclaiming that the term
Sunday Obligation really means what it says.
After years of being accused of being
“too authoritarian,” it seems the Church decided to take a different approach,
beginning during the tumultuous 1960s. Instead of proclaiming, “You are
OBLIGATED to go to Mass on Sunday!” the Church offered a new, gentle Mr. Rogers-like
tone: “We hope you’ll want to join us at Mass on Sundays.”
Well, this is certainly a more gentle
approach, but frankly, it ain’t working. Maybe it’s time once again for a bit
firmer message. Not quite the authoritarian ruler-wielding nun approach, but
maybe something with a tad more backbone, such as: “If you don’t go to Mass on
Sundays, don’t blame me when Jesus kicks your butt!”
Yeah, OK, that’s not quite the correct
tone either, is it? There’s got to be a way to communicate once again the clear
message that the Sunday Obligation is a real thing, and there are truly eternal
consequences for blowing off Mass each week. We really have to try something
different. I mean, precious souls are being lost for all eternity.
Maybe there is a compromise somewhere
in the middle, an approach that is both firm but gentle, urgent and yet loving.
I’m thinking of a ruler-wielding Mr. Rogers. “Won’t you be my neighbor? Won’t
you join me at Sunday Mass?” Whack!
Friday, March 20, 2015
The ‘Wait, What?!’ of the Week
According to news reports, a recently
translated Iranian military textbook endorses a nuclear EMP attack against the
United States. An atmospheric nuclear explosion would produce an Electro
Magnetic Pulse (EMP), which most experts feel would cripple America’s electric
grid for months, if not years. The resulting chaos and loss of life would be
catastrophic. So therefore, since elements of the Iranian military endorse doing grave harm to our country, the Obama Administration is now threatening sanctions against …
Israel.
Wait. What?! We’re abandoning our
longtime ally, Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East? And at the same
time we are allowing Iran, a nation that has vowed to destroy both Israel and
the U.S., to continue working on its nuclear program? What am I missing here?
Up is now down, and down is now up. Sheesh.
Thursday, March 19, 2015
'Attitude of Gratitude' for Thursday Morning
I'm grateful today is the last day of winter. Uh oh, gotta go scrape ice off my windshield or I'll be late for work!
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
Burglars Love Social Media
I heard an interesting news story the
other day: a research study found that 78-percent of burglars use social media
to determine which houses to rob. I’m not quite sure how someone does a
research study of burglars. I suppose you either could conduct prison
interviews, in which case you’d be getting data from the less talented segment
of that profession, the ones who got caught. Or maybe the researchers simply
attended the monthly meetings of the Royal Order of Burglarizing Rogues
(R.O.B.R., for short), which meets every fourth Tuesday at Applebee’s (where
the manager wonders why the silverware keeps disappearing).
Well, whatever the exact percentage, I
have no doubt many burglars use Internet-based social media to target their
victims, because many people routinely use Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to
make the following announcement: “Attention please! My house will be empty for
the next seven days, so feel free to steal my new flat-screen TV. Oh, and my
jewelry is in the master bedroom dresser, top drawer on the right.”
OK, maybe people don’t phrase their social
media comments quite like that, but they don’t have to. The exact same message
is communicated when they, for example, post a selfie photo on Facebook with
this note: “Just landed in Miami. Gonna sit by the pool for a full week. Try to
stay warm in freezing Connecticut!”
Why do people announce to the whole
world that their homes are empty? The answer is simple: people are as dumb as
rocks. No wait, that’s not it. You can’t acquire a nice home with a lot of nice
stuff worth stealing, and the money to vacation in Miami, if you’re dumb. The
problem is, when a social media website like Facebook uses the term “friend,”
many people actually assume it means “friend,” and they think to themselves,
“I’m only sharing this poolside photo with my friends, and of course, my
friends would never rob my house.”
But in Facebook parlance, the term
“friend” actually means: “a random stranger who used to work with a person who
was once a neighbor of a person who went to college with a person who I vaguely
remember from high school.” The Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon has nothing on the
Five Degrees of Facebook Friending. (Sorry if that reference is too obscure.
Google it.) In other words, when you post something on Facebook that you think
only three or four of your closest friends will see, you might as well plaster
the message on billboards along the side of every Interstate highway in America.
I suspect your Facebook posting is one of the PowerPoint slides during the
monthly R.O.B.R. meetings.
So, what is the solution to this
problem? Well, people can wait until they return from their vacation before
posting photos online. But that’s unlikely in our instant gratification,
impulsive culture because it eliminates the “nyah nyah effect.” (This is the
true sentiment behind the poolside photo posting, which is, “Nyah nyah! I’m
sitting under a palm tree while you’re shoveling snow! Nyah nyah!”)
The better solution is to add a couple
of extra comments along with the poolside photo, such as: “I’m glad my cousin
Max is house-sitting for us while we’re away. He’s the guy with the extensive
gun collection and anger management issues.” Or: “We weren’t sure we could
afford to vacation in Miami this year after all the money we spent on the
high-tech home security system, which includes surveillance cameras,
electrified fences, and tripwires that set off claymore mines.”
If you still insist on telling the
world you’re on vacation, and you end up getting robbed, all I can say is,
“Nyah nyah!”
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Want to Go to Heaven … Next Tuesday?
There’s an old expression I just made
up: “Everybody wants to go to Heaven, but nobody wants to go next Tuesday.”
As Catholics, we have a firm belief in
life after death. After all, it’s right there at the very end of the Creed we
recite at Mass each week: “…I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and
the life of the world to come. Amen.”
If we did not believe in life after
death, then we would be, as St. Paul wrote in 1st Corinthians, “The most
pitiable of all people.” Imagine living our lives as if God and Heaven were
real, but then it turned out that neither was true. That would indeed be
pitiful.
On the other hand, there are many
Catholics who claim to believe God and Heaven are real, but live their everyday
lives as if neither existed. This, too, is rather pitiful. And risky.
But if we really believe that Heaven
is real and that eternal life with God is possible, then surely we must
understand that getting to Heaven is infinitely more important than anything
that happens to us during our time here on earth. And surely we understand that
eternity in Heaven is better than even 90 or 100 wonderful years of natural
life.
I did the math, and I discovered that
when you compare 90 or 100 years to eternity, eternity is a wee bit longer—in
the same way a billion-trillion miles is a wee bit longer than one inch.
So we all should be thrilled at the
prospects of going to Heaven—even if it happens next Tuesday.
Ooh, how many of you instinctively
cringed at the idea of going to Heaven next Tuesday? I admit I did. And the
reason is simple: no one can go to Heaven unless they first die. Just the very
thought of dying, whether next Tuesday or some other day, is, well,
disconcerting to say the least.
As Catholics we really should not fear
death. Does this mean we should encourage death and hasten its arrival?
Obviously not. Even though we look forward to Heaven, we must cherish life—from
conception to natural death.
That reminds me of when I was a
youngster and made my First Confession and First Communion in the 2nd grade.
The nuns taught us that Confession cleanses us of all our sins, and so if, for
example, we got hit by lightning and killed the moment we walked out of the
confessional, we would definitely go straight to Heaven. (On further
reflection, I’m not sure that’s the best scenario to present to 2nd graders.
But theologically speaking it’s correct.)
So here’s the conundrum (I like that
word): the ultimate goal of life is to get to Heaven. But at the same time, the
ultimate goal of secular, natural life is not to die. We have a bit of a
conflict here. We fear “next Tuesday,” but unless we experience it we can’t go
to Heaven.
This is what we need to do: first,
don’t obsess about this topic nearly as much as I have over the past 500 words.
Next, don’t fear death, even though it’s the great unknown and kind of scary.
Every one of us will experience it, and it is not the end but instead a
transition to something potentially much better. (Or much worse, which is why
Confession is so important.)
Finally, we must make sure that when
our personal “next Tuesday” arrives we will in fact go to Heaven. We must put
our faith in Jesus, partake of the sacraments often—especially Confession—and
love our neighbors as ourselves.
OK then, there’s nothing to fear,
right? Plus today is only Wednesday, so we’ve got at least another six days!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)